OOC Thread

[Fatebringer]

LOL, I was SO thrown off by the renaming of the turns Glad to see the old numbers back though

[Parmenion]

So... who's stolen all the combat threads?   

October 13, and there's scarcely a whiff of cordite in the air.

[Dave Baughman]

So... who's stolen all the combat threads?  

October 13, and there's scarcely a whiff of cordite in the air.

That's partly my fault. I have a ton of Falcon, Hellion, etc threads to post and I haven't had the time to post them yet. Tonight hopefully, but if not definitely tomorrow night things should be heating up a bit.

[Deathrider6]

Fate all of "ours" are done right? I would be posting in the RP thread but am suffering a vicious case of writer's block. Hopefully I can shake it and get the muse rolling.

[Holt]

For the life of me I cant find the loyalty rules anywhere, can anyone else? I would like to read up on them.

[Fatebringer]

Fate all of "ours" are done right? I would be posting in the RP thread but am suffering a vicious case of writer's block. Hopefully I can shake it and get the muse rolling.

We have the warship break out match and continuous RP 

[Fatebringer]

Man, it's hard to try and understand those SS rolls

[Daemonknight]

For the life of me I cant find the loyalty rules anywhere, can anyone else? I would like to read up on them.

I assume you are referencing the rolls some of your Cappie units have been subjected to. The results tables, and the criteria for which units are subject to them, are not available for public dissemination. They are a consequence of the method in which the CC was taken over by the Sharks.

[Holt]

I thought those units had already made their rolls, if I had known of further rolls i would have taken precautions. I am not a fan of unpublished rules.

For the life of me I cant find the loyalty rules anywhere, can anyone else? I would like to read up on them.

I assume you are referencing the rolls some of your Cappie units have been subjected to. The results tables, and the criteria for which units are subject to them, are not available for public dissemination. They are a consequence of the method in which the CC was taken over by the Sharks.

[Daemonknight]

Normally I don't either, but the point is that you have potentially unreliable units among your command, and telling you exactly who they are defeats the purpose of having them be unreliable, as does telling you what the mechanics behind their potential disloyalty are.

[Holt]

I have no problem with the rolls themselves, or the mechanics behind them. Its the the player base did not know it could happen, last turn I was told which units heeded to the SS orders and those that didnt and now every unit is rolling again.

[Daemonknight]

Not every unit, less than half I believe, though I havn't gone through and counted exactly. Also, most of the time, assuming a unit fails it's Loyalty check, it'll either sit there and do nothing, or leave the hex, but otherwise remain under your control.

[Holt]

Out of i think 5 rolls, one has already turned rebel; on an 11 or 12 an 11% chance.

[Holt]

Btw dont think that I dont like the rule or that its broken in any way, i just hate being the guinea pig by having these rules sprung on me; because from now on people will plan for this, something icouldnt do.

[Daemonknight]

I don't know how you think they(or you) could've planned for it