Rules Discussion

[Daemonknight]

I've heard that PFs will be buildable, with a similar cost-timeline to SYs. But who knows when that rule is going to go active... prolly when the R&D rules get finalized.

Will there be a possibility to gain PFs later too?

I would have a planet in mind where I would build a new War School, like the CGuards did on Tuk.. Just they got a PF for that.

Not to mention very much smaller powers.

[Jeyar]

I have a question for people:

Just how many "PF's" are canon and not represented in your realms?

[Daemonknight]

what do you mean?

PF is suitibly abstract, like most things in this game. The NAIS is an example of a very high-grade of PF. Techniclly, a PF can be anything from a permenant training facility, to a govornment sponsored think-tank, to a university. It doesn't have to be a renouned facility, because theres only a handful.

If you're asking how many PFs that're displayed are NAIS calibre, probably most of the PFs that exist are designed to represent well known facilities. But thats a product of their rules. In their next incarnation, they'll be a much more usefull tool, instead of just giving an abstract bonus to random research rolls.

[chaosxtreme]

I have a question for people:

Just how many "PF's" are canon and not represented in your realms?

Over 9,000!

PF level over 9,000....but..but thats impossible!!!

[Daemonknight]

Over 9000 Remix!

[Marlin]

OMG, you are such nerds!

[Daemonknight]

you say that as if it's a bad thing

[Marlin]

 

Ok ok. I am one, too, but that's not the point.

I guess we move back to topic, I think there are still some issues unadressed.

[Fatebringer]

I'm trying to make sure I have my Terrorism rules correct because Tamar is no longer contested...but they seem to be missing from the rules now...

Bump

[Dave Baughman]

I'm trying to make sure I have my Terrorism rules correct because Tamar is no longer contested...but they seem to be missing from the rules now...

Bump

Terrorized hexes do not produce resource points. When I do this turns rules update I'll clarify that point.

[Fatebringer]

kk, I thought it was something like 1/2 RP and 1/2 production. So noted on the sheet. I know there used to be a better definition for Terror Effects, but I couldn't find it :p

[Marlin]

Can we please get rid of the Thread Title guidelines' Turn number requirement?

As the turns are already in their own subforums, I see no need to add a turn number at all.

[Dave Baughman]

Can we please get rid of the Thread Title guidelines' Turn number requirement?

As the turns are already in their own subforums, I see no need to add a turn number at all.

The turn folders are not going to be there forever. Eventually I am going to have to compress the old ones down into a single archive folder, and then the turn numbers in the thread titles are going to be pertinent.

[Marlin]

  But, but I loved the folders!!

Ok. So noted.

[Jeyar]

lol - I was going to this thread to suggest the same thing this very thing just now.